ENERGY STAR is either the most 'successful' or most 'corrupt' government program in US history! Did a media blackout of EPA's highly lucrative brand of government certified 'energy efficiency' just influence the outcome of the most important election in recent history?
In this razor-tight race, Big Green's money and prestige should have easily been able to swing the election in Hillary's favor. So what happened? Why did mainstream media suddenly stop quoting the academics, business-leaders and lawyers behind Obama's Clean Energy Economy during the election?
EPA claims their ENERGY STAR brand of certified 'energy efficiency' is allegedly generating billions of dollars in energy-savings for large corporations and foreign governments annually, so where were all the glowing testimonials from bureaucrats, lawyers and radicals marketing climate-friendly goods and services? Why was there no media effort to explain Hillary's Advanced Buildings initiative, and who exactly would get all those high-paying green jobs?
The ENERGY STAR program is arguably the most corrupt government agency in US history marketing a single unique product; government energy efficiency. A product that doesn't exist in the real world. EPA's multi-billion dollar invention is not controlled by National Standards, Congressional legislation or mathematical equations to determine quantitative outcomes. Which may explain why media isn't willing to discuss the scientific evidence supporting EPA's unique commodity, because there is none.
Did Fake News outlets bury the ENERGY STAR 'success' story to hide the lack of actual evidence supporting EPA's multi-billion dollar energy-saving claims? Or was it part of a larger Global marketing scheme, designed to allow President Hillary Clinton to re-introduce this tired old program as a new and innovative State Owned Enterprise. Whatever the reason, it cost Hillary the election.
Taxpayers have spent untold billions propping up the ENERGY STAR brand which is mandated for use by all levels of government, only to have media impose a total news blackout on ENERGY STAR, Obama's Clean Power Plan and it's Clean Energy Investment Program during the election. Almost like they were ashamed to report on all the cutting-edge science making their pals rich.
Obama's Clean Energy Economy wasn't on the ballot, but all of EPA's corrupt policies, Junk Science and draconian regulations were the main driving force for tens of millions of voters. Was it not EPA's superior understanding of science and technology that supposedly provided Progressives a huge advantage over the knuckle-dragging Troglodyte?
This EPA brand has been the proverbial "Goose That Lays The Golden Eggs" for decades, but suddenly nobody wants to talk about how the magic happens.
Democrat media will now blame the FBI, KKK and Russians for their humiliating loss, but steadfastly refuse to consider the actual political policies supported by their flawed Presidential candidate.
Democrats and their Fake News partners were recently demanding RICO charges be filed against science deniers, are now quietly seeking a Presidential Pardon for Crooked Hillary. All while secretive non-profit groups that benefit from EPA's multi-billion corporate welfare programs go unquestioned. "Don't Follow the Money" has now become the new mantra for media.
Fake News and Junk Science go hand in hand, so don't expect anyone to report on crooked green schemes conducted under the guise of scientific research, because the money trail will lead directly back to EPA'S Billionaires Club. Silence is Golden!
The same groups which instituted a 'gas-lighting' campaign to deny the existence of the UN's Agenda 21 Development Plan, also have denounced all critics of back-room policies designed to 'Level The Playing Field' and 'Eliminate Barriers' to government's non-profit partners. Placing Ethical Oil, Green Coal and the Poised For Profits Partnership in charge of Obama's Clean Energy Economy, just don't question their math if you know what's good for you.
Lancet, one of the world's most respected scientific journals stated that up to half of all recent peer-reviewed papers may be unreliable at best, if not completely false. The 'Clock Boy' quality of EPA's scientific research and bogus technical reports may impress the media, but what about your own lying eyes?